UbuWeb | UbuWeb Papers Why I Am The Author of Sound Poetry and Free Poetry Henri Chopin, 1967
I, personally, would perfer the chaos
and disorder which each of us would strive to master, in terms
of his own ingenuousness, to the order imposed by the Word which
everybody uses indiscriminately, always for the benefit of a capitol,
of a church, of a socialism, etc....
No one has ever tried to establish
chaos as a system, or to let it come. Perhaps there would be more
dead among the weak constitutions, but certainly there could be
fewer than there are in that order which defends the Word, from
the socialisms to the capitalisms. Undoubtedly there would be
more alive beings and fewer dead beings, such as employees, bureaucrats,
business and government executives, who are all dead and who forget
the essential thing: to be alive.
The Word has created profit, it has
justified work, it has made obligatory the confusion of occupation
(to be doing something), it has permitted life to lie. The Word
has become incarnate in the Vatican, on the rostrums of Peking,
at the Elysee, and even if, often, it creates the inaccurate SIGNIFICATION,
which signifies differently for each of us unless one accepts
and obeys, if, often, it imposes multiple points of view which
never adhere to the life of a single person and which one accepts
by default, in what way can it be useful to us? I answer: in no
way.
Because it is not useful that anyone
should understand me, it is not useful that anyone should be able
to order me to do this or that thing. It is not useful to have
a cult that all can understand and that is there for all, it is
not necessary that I should know myself to be imposed upon in
my life by an all-powerful Word which was created for past
epochs that will never return: that adequate to tribes, to small
nations, to small ethnic groups which were disseminated around
the globe into places whose origins escape us.
The Word today serves no one except
to say to the grocer: give me a pound of lentils.
The Word is useful no more; it even
becomes an enemy when a single man uses it as a divine word to
speak of a problematic god or of a problematic dictator. The Word
becomes the cancer of humanity when it vulgarizes itself to the
point of impoverishment trying to make words for all, promises
for all, which will not be kept, descriptions of life which will
be either scholarly or literary which will take centuries to elaborate
upon with no time left for life.
The Word is responsbile for the phallic
death because it dominates the senses and the phallus which are
submissive to it; it is responsible for the birth of the exasperated
who serve verbose principles.
It is responsible for the general
incomprehension of beings who succumb to murders, racisms, concentrations,
the laws, etc.
In short, the Word is responsible
because instead of making it a way of life we've made it an end.
Prisoner of the Word is the child, and so he will be all his adult
life.
But, without falling into anecdote,
one can mention the names of some who insisted upon breaking the
bonds imposed by the Word. If timid essays by Aristophanes showed
that sound was indispensable- the sound imitative of an element
or an animal then -that does not mean that it was sought after
for its own sake. In that case, the sound uttered by the mouth
was cut off, since it only came from an imagined and subordinated
usage, when in fact it is the major element.
It will not be investigated for its
importance in the sixteenth century either since it must be molded
by musical polyphony. It will not be liberated by the Expressionists
since they needed the support of syllables and letters as did
the Futurists, Dadaists and Lettristes.
The buccal sound, the human sound,
in fact, will come to meet us only around 1953, with Wolmann,
Brau, Dufrene, and somewhat later with my audiopoems.
But why want these a-significant
human sounds, without alphabet, without reference to an explicative
clarity? Simply, I have implied it, the Word is incomprehensible
and abusive, because it is in all the hands, rather in all the
mouths, which are being given orders by a few mostly unauthorized
voices.
The mimetic sound of man, the human
sound, does not explain, it transmits emotions, it suggests exchanges,
affective communications; it does not state precisely, it is precise.
And I would say well that the act of love of a couple is precise,
is voluntary, if it does not explain! What then is the function
of the Word, which has the pretension to affirm that such and
such a thing is clear? I defy that Word.
I accused it and I still accuse it
as an impediment to living, it makes us lose the meager decades
of our existence explaining ourselves to a so-called spiritual,
political, social, or religious court. Through it we must render
accounts to the entire world; we are dependent upon the mediocrities
Sartre, Mauriac, De Gaulle. They own us in every area; we are
slaves of rhetoric, prisoners of explanation that explains nothing.
Nothing is yet explainable.
That is why a suggestive art which
leaves the body, that resonator and that receptacle, animated,
breathed and acted, that + and-, that is why a suggestive art
was made; it had to come, and nourish, and in no way affirm. You
will like this art, or you will not like it, that is of no importance!
In spite of yourself it will embrace you, it will circulate in
you. That is its role. It must open our effectors to our own biological,
physical and mental potentialities beyond all intellect; art must
be valued like a vegetable, it feeds us differently, that is all.
And when it gets into you, it makes you want to embrace it. That
way the Word is reduced to its proper role subordinate to life;
it serves only to propose intelligible usages, elementary exchanges,
but never will it canal the admirable powers of life, because
this meager canaling, as I have implied, finally provokes usury
in us through the absence of real life.
Let us not lose 4/5ths of intense
life without Word to the benefit of the small l/5th of verbiage.
Let us be frank and just. Let us know that the day is of oxygen,
that the night eliminates our poisons, that the entire body breathes
and that it is a wholeness, without the vanity of a Word that
can reduce us.
I prefer the sun, I'm fond of the
night, I'm fond of my noises and of my sounds, I admire the immense
complex factory of a body, I'm fond of my glances that touch,
of my ears that see, of my eyes that receive.... But I do not
have to have the benediction of the written idea. I do not have
to have my life derived from the intelligible. I do not want to
bc subject to the true word which is forever misleading or Iying,
I can stand no longer to be destroyed by the Lord, that lie that
abolishes itself on paper. |